As we step into 2024, the world of music streaming continues to evolve at a rapid pace. For artists, listeners, and music enthusiasts, two platforms have remained prominent: SoundCloud and Spotify. Both of these platforms serve as vital hubs for discovering new music, but they cater to different needs and experiences. The question remains, which is better in 2024? The answer depends largely on what you’re looking for in a streaming service. In this article, we’ll break down their features, artist support, music discovery, audio quality, subscription options, and community engagement to help you decide which is better suited for you.
Spotify has been a household name since its launch in 2008, offering a user-friendly streaming experience. It has become the global leader in music streaming with a vast library of over 100 million tracks, podcasts, and exclusive content from major artists, as well as emerging creators. Spotify’s dominance is largely due to its algorithms, which recommend music based on user preferences, and its partnerships with major record labels.
SoundCloud, on the other hand, emerged in 2007 as a platform for independent and underground artists. It became famous as a community-driven platform where creators can upload their own music. Over time, SoundCloud has amassed a diverse catalog of music, spanning all genres, including niche genres and unsigned artists. Unlike Spotify, SoundCloud’s model was designed to give artists direct control over their music distribution, making it the go-to platform for independent musicians.
In terms of sheer size, Spotify boasts a much larger library. With over 100 million tracks from mainstream artists, podcasts, and exclusive releases, you can find almost any song you’re looking for. Spotify excels at music discovery, with curated playlists like Discover Weekly and Release Radar, along with the highly regarded Spotify Wrapped, which offers personalized year-end reviews of your listening habits. For fans of big-name artists, major releases, and a seamless mainstream experience, Spotify remains unparalleled.
SoundCloud, however, offers something that Spotify does not: a treasure trove of underground and indie music. While its library is smaller in terms of officially released, well-known tracks, SoundCloud’s value lies in the diversity of the music you can discover. Many artists get their start on SoundCloud, and the platform often features remixes, bootlegs, and live recordings that can’t be found on Spotify. If you’re into discovering undiscovered gems, experimental music, or supporting independent artists directly, SoundCloud’s user-generated content may be more exciting for you.
Verdict: For mainstream music and algorithm-driven discovery, Spotify wins. But for indie and underground music, SoundCloud remains unmatched.
One of the biggest differences between the two platforms is how they support artists.
Spotify has long been criticized for its payout rates, especially for smaller artists. While it does pay artists through the traditional music industry model—based on the number of streams—many musicians, especially independent ones, find that they earn very little unless they have a large audience. On the plus side, Spotify offers several tools to help artists grow their audiences, like Spotify for Artists, which provides analytics and insights, playlist pitching tools, and promotional options.
SoundCloud, however, has always been more artist-centric, offering various ways for musicians to monetize their content. In addition to ad revenue from its free-tier listeners, SoundCloud introduced SoundCloud Premier, which lets artists monetize directly from streams. Its Fan-Powered Royalties system, which launched in 2021, ensures that fans’ payments go directly to the artists they listen to most frequently, unlike Spotify’s pool-based system, where royalties are split across all streams. SoundCloud also offers Pro Unlimited, which gives artists more control over their music distribution, better analytics, and unlimited upload storage.
Verdict: For independent artists and those seeking better monetization opportunities, SoundCloud takes the crown. For more mainstream artists signed to labels, Spotify remains the preferred platform.
When it comes to audio quality, both platforms offer solid options, though they have different approaches to sound.
Spotify offers streaming at up to 320kbps in its Premium tier, which is generally considered high-quality for casual listeners. While Spotify had announced its high-fidelity streaming option (Spotify HiFi) back in 2021, as of 2024, it still hasn’t fully rolled out. The delay in launching HiFi has frustrated some audiophiles who prefer lossless audio formats.
SoundCloud, on the other hand, is known for having a wide variety of audio quality due to its user-generated nature. The quality of tracks can vary significantly depending on how the artist or user uploaded the song. For premium users, SoundCloud offers high-quality streaming at 256kbps AAC. While that doesn’t match Spotify’s 320kbps, SoundCloud’s appeal isn’t just about pristine sound; it’s more about access to rare, underground tracks and lesser-known artists. That said, for fans of independent and underground music, the trade-off in quality might not be as important.
Verdict: If high-quality audio is a must, Spotify‘s 320kbps streaming edges out SoundCloud. However, both platforms fall short when it comes to true HiFi quality, making this a tie depending on your priorities.
In terms of pricing, both platforms offer free and premium tiers, but the experiences differ significantly.
Spotify has a free tier supported by ads, which limits some features such as offline downloads and skips. Its Premium plan costs around $10 per month, with discounts for students, families, and bundles that include podcasts and exclusive content. The paid version provides an ad-free experience, higher streaming quality, unlimited skips, and offline listening. For many, Spotify Premium offers a solid deal, considering its vast catalog and polished user experience.
SoundCloud also offers a free tier, where users can listen to most tracks with ads, but it comes with limitations such as lower sound quality and limited access to some tracks behind its paywall. The SoundCloud Go subscription, priced at $4.99 a month, offers ad-free streaming and access to offline playback. For those looking for more, SoundCloud Go+ ($9.99 a month) gives users access to the full library with higher quality streaming.
Verdict: Spotify Premium offers a more complete package for its price, especially when considering its large music library and additional perks like podcasts. SoundCloud Go+ is a great option for fans of underground music who want ad-free access, but overall, Spotify offers better value for mainstream music listeners.
Both platforms offer community features but in very different ways.
SoundCloud has always been about community. It allows users to comment on specific moments in a track, creating a space for fan interaction and artist feedback. This sense of collaboration and interaction has helped build strong connections between creators and listeners. SoundCloud’s grassroots community feel is ideal for indie musicians and fans who want a deeper connection with the music and its creators.
Spotify focuses less on community engagement and more on passive listening and discovery. While it does offer social sharing, collaborative playlists, and integration with social media platforms, the community interaction is not nearly as robust as SoundCloud’s. Spotify’s focus is primarily on delivering a curated and personalized experience rather than creating a social space for fans and artists to interact.
Verdict: If you’re looking for community engagement and direct interaction with artists, SoundCloud has the upper hand. For passive listening and sharing with friends, Spotify is more user-friendly.
How easy is it to use each platform?
Spotify is known for its sleek, intuitive interface, making it easy for users to navigate playlists, discover new music, and engage with podcasts. The design focuses heavily on user-friendliness, with features like drag-and-drop playlist creation, seamless transitions between music and podcasts, and a clean, organized layout. The mobile app mirrors the desktop experience, maintaining simplicity and smoothness. The “Your Library” section helps users quickly access their playlists, liked songs, and followed artists.
On the other hand, SoundCloud has a more community-centric, content-focused interface. While it’s functional and allows easy music uploads for artists, its design isn’t as streamlined as Spotify’s. The interface can feel slightly cluttered, particularly due to its focus on track comments and community interactions. SoundCloud’s mobile app is effective but may feel a bit dated compared to Spotify’s polished experience, especially for users focused on music discovery rather than community interaction.
Example addition:
“In terms of interface, Spotify offers a clean, streamlined design that focuses on ease of use, making music discovery and playlist creation seamless. SoundCloud, while functional, caters more to users interested in the back-and-forth interaction between artists and listeners. The UI feels more community-driven, though not as polished.”
Spotify’s podcast dominance vs SoundCloud’s indie offerings
Spotify has emerged as a leader in the podcasting world, hosting exclusive deals with big names like Joe Rogan and Michelle Obama, as well as an ever-expanding library of both independent and network-produced podcasts. With features like automatic podcast episode downloads and curated recommendations, Spotify ensures an engaging experience for podcast listeners. For many users, Spotify serves as an all-in-one platform for both music and podcasts.
SoundCloud, while supporting podcasts, remains primarily a music-first platform. Its podcast catalog is considerably smaller, and it lacks the exclusivity deals or promotional focus that Spotify has invested in. For indie podcasters, SoundCloud offers a platform for distribution but hasn’t made the same push to be a major player in the podcasting space.
Example addition:
“If podcasts are an important part of your listening experience, Spotify has a clear advantage. With exclusive deals and a vast catalog of popular shows, Spotify’s push into podcasting sets it apart. SoundCloud, while capable of hosting podcasts, remains focused on its music-first community and has a smaller offering in this category.”
How each platform caters to your listening habits
Spotify has been continuously improving its recommendation algorithms, using AI to track user preferences and listening habits. Features like Discover Weekly and Daily Mix playlists provide personalized suggestions based on your listening history. Spotify also offers end-of-year recaps, like Spotify Wrapped, that give users insight into their most-played artists, tracks, and genres. This algorithm-driven approach makes it incredibly effective for users looking to discover new music that aligns with their tastes.
In contrast, SoundCloud leans more on community-based discovery rather than sophisticated algorithms. Music recommendations on SoundCloud are more organic, with users discovering new artists through what’s trending, community interactions, and fan uploads. This system can lead to discovering more experimental or niche tracks but doesn’t provide the same level of personalized recommendations as Spotify’s AI-driven system.
Example addition:
“Spotify’s AI-driven music recommendations continue to set the standard. With features like Discover Weekly and Daily Mix, the platform is excellent at learning your preferences and surfacing new tracks. SoundCloud, on the other hand, leans more on its community aspect. Instead of hyper-personalized algorithms, you’re more likely to discover new music based on what’s trending within niche communities or by following specific artists.”
Which platform offers more exclusive content?
Spotify has made significant strides in exclusive content, particularly with its podcast deals. Big-name creators like Joe Rogan, as well as some exclusive music releases, ensure that users have access to content they won’t find anywhere else. Additionally, some artists release albums or tracks first on Spotify, creating an incentive for users to stick with the platform. Exclusive playlists, artist radio stations, and partnerships with top labels further enhance Spotify’s appeal.
SoundCloud’s exclusivity, however, is more about its user-generated content. Many indie artists, particularly those not signed with major labels, upload their music first (or only) to SoundCloud. This makes the platform a treasure trove for unreleased tracks, remixes, and live recordings that might not appear on Spotify. For fans of underground music, this type of exclusivity is valuable in ways that mainstream releases might not be.
Example addition:
“In 2024, Spotify continues to build on its exclusive content offerings. Whether it’s an early album release or exclusive podcast deals, Spotify gives users access to content they won’t find elsewhere. SoundCloud’s exclusivity lies in its user-generated content and underground music scene, offering tracks from artists who aren’t found on major streaming platforms.”
Feature | Spotify | SoundCloud |
---|---|---|
Music Library | 100 million+ tracks, major labels | 320 million+ tracks, indie and underground |
Podcasts | Extensive podcast library, exclusives | Smaller podcast library, indie creators |
Audio Quality | Up to 320kbps (Premium) | Up to 256kbps (Go+) |
Artist Monetization | Traditional industry model | Fan-powered royalties, artist-friendly |
Discovery Features | Algorithm-based recommendations (AI-driven) | Community-driven discovery, fan uploads |
Subscription Cost | $9.99/month (Premium) | $4.99 (Go) / $9.99 (Go+) |
Where are these platforms available, and how have they expanded globally?
Spotify continues to be the leader in terms of global reach. As of 2024, it is available in over 180 countries, covering all major music markets and beyond. This extensive availability has contributed to its massive user base and allows listeners to discover a wide range of music from various cultures and languages.
SoundCloud also has a global presence but remains more niche in comparison. The platform is accessible worldwide, but it tends to thrive within specific artist communities, particularly in regions like North America and Europe. SoundCloud’s focus on indie and underground music gives it a unique cultural appeal in various global music scenes, such as independent rap or electronic music.
Example addition:
“As of 2024, Spotify has extended its reach to over 180 countries, making it accessible to users worldwide with a catalog that spans multiple languages and genres. SoundCloud, though also available globally, remains more niche, with strong communities of independent creators in regions such as North America, Europe, and Africa.”
How do these platforms integrate with social media?
Spotify offers robust social media integration, making it easy for users to share their favorite songs, albums, and playlists across platforms like Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter. Its seamless integration with Instagram Stories, for example, lets users post tracks directly into their stories, driving engagement and discovery among friends and followers. Collaborative playlists also allow friends to work together on curating music collections.
SoundCloud provides more direct interaction between artists and fans, allowing users to comment on specific moments in tracks and share music with friends. For creators, this interaction builds a strong sense of community and feedback, helping them connect with their audience on a more personal level. While SoundCloud also offers social sharing options, its artist-first approach sets it apart from Spotify.
Example addition:
“When it comes to sharing and integrating with social media, Spotify allows for easy integration with platforms like Instagram Stories, making it easy for users to share tracks with their friends. SoundCloud offers artists the ability to interact directly with their audience, making it a more social experience for both creators and fans.”
What’s next for both platforms in 2024 and beyond?
Spotify has long been teasing the release of its HiFi option, which would offer lossless, CD-quality audio for users seeking a premium listening experience. Though this feature has been delayed, it’s still highly anticipated by audiophiles. Additionally, Spotify is likely to continue expanding its exclusive content offerings and making improvements to its AI-driven music discovery.
SoundCloud, on the other hand, will likely continue focusing on supporting independent artists through initiatives like Fan-Powered Royalties. As it grows, SoundCloud could further cement its place as the go-to platform for independent creators, offering more tools and support to help them monetize their work and reach larger audiences.
Example addition:
“Looking ahead, Spotify is set to introduce its much-anticipated HiFi feature, giving audiophiles a long-awaited high-quality option. SoundCloud continues to prioritize supporting independent artists and growing its community-driven approach, making it a key player in empowering creators.”
The question of whether SoundCloud or Spotify is better in 2024 doesn’t have a one-size-fits-all answer. Both platforms offer unique experiences tailored to different audiences.
Ultimately, your choice between SoundCloud and Spotify in 2024 will depend on what kind of listener (or artist) you are. For mainstream music with polished recommendations and high accessibility, Spotify remains unbeatable. For raw, undiscovered talent and a grassroots community experience, SoundCloud still holds its ground as a unique platform for music discovery and artist empowerment.
Check out my extensive catalog of more than 500 custom-made beats and instrumentals, available for free download or licensing.
THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT is made on 7th June 2024 ("Effective Date") by and between Licensee(hereinafter referred to as the "Licensee") also, if applicable, professionally known as Licensee, residing at [N/A] and Thomas Hodek. (hereinafter referred to as the "Licensor"). Licensor warrants that it controls the mechanical rights in and to the copyrighted musical work entitled "BEAT NAME("Composition") as of and prior to the date first written above. The Composition, including the music thereof, was composed by Thomas Hodek ("Songwriter") managed under the Licensor.
All licenses are non-refundable and non-transferable.
Master Use.
The Licensor hereby grants to Licensee an exclusive license (this "License) to record vocal synchronization to the Composition partly or in its entirety and substantially in its original form ("Master Recording“).
Mechanical Rights.
The Licensor hereby grants to Licensee an exclusive license to use Master Recording in the reproduction, duplication, manufacture, and distribution of phonograph records, cassette tapes, compact disk, digital downloads, other miscellaneous audio and digital recordings, and any lifts and versions thereof (collectively, the "Recordings", and individually, a "Recordings") worldwide for unlimited copies of such Recordings or any combination of such Recordings, condition upon the payment to the Licensor a sum of Varies US Dollars ($Varies), receipt of which is confirmed. Additionally licensee shall be permitted to distribute unlimited internet downloads for non-profit and non-commercial use.
Performance Rights.
The Licensor here by grants to Licensee an exclusive license to use the Master Recording in unlimited for- profit performances, shows, or concerts.
Broadcast Rights.
The Licensor hereby grants to Licensee an exclusive license to broadcast or air the Master Recording in unlimited amounts of radio stations.
Credit.
Licensee shall acknowledge the original authorship of the Composition appropriately and reasonably in all media and performance formats under the name "Thomas Hodek" in writing where possible and vocally otherwise.
Synchronization.
Licensee may exploit and monetize from licensee's unique derived work(s) of composition for use on TV, Film, Video game or other synchronous projects. Licensee may represent other publishing owners of the original composition for exploitation and have full authority of granting non-exclusive license for synchronization use as long as credit and publishing information is provided to such agency.
Consideration.
In consideration for the rights granted under this agreement, Licensee shall pay to licensor the sum of Varies US dollars ($Varies) and other good and valuable consideration, payable to "Thomas Hodek", receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. If the Licensee fails to account to the Licensor, timely complete the payments provided for hereunder, or perform its other obligations hereunder, including having insufficient bank balance, the licensor shall have the right to terminate License upon written notice to the Licensee. Such termination shall render the recording, manufacture and/or distribution of Recordings for which monies have not been paid subject to and actionable infringements under applicable law, including, without limitation, the United States Copyright Act, as amended.
Indemnification.
Accordingly, Licensee agrees to indemnify and hold Licensor harmless from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, costs, expenses, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees, arising of or resulting from a claimed breach of any of Licensee's representations, warranties or agreements hereunder.
Audio Samples.
3rd party sample clearance is the responsibility of the licensee.
Miscellaneous.
This license is non-transferable and is limited to the Composition specified above.
Governing Law.
This License is governed by and shall be construed under the law of the Bayern DE, without regard to the conflicts of laws principles thereof.
- Licensee, owns 50% of publishing rights. - Tellingbeatzz (GEMA), owns 50% of publishing rights - Licensee, owns 50% of publishing rights. - Tellingbeatzz (GEMA), owns 50% of publishing rights
To download your free version of please enter your name and email address and the download link will be emailed to you
No Comments